Talk:Text processing/Max licenses in use: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
(numbering bad, existing name bad)
Line 14: Line 14:
== Name change needed ==
== Name change needed ==
This new name is really awful. It tells you so little about the task, and is '''boring'''. Please revert the change, Max licenses in use is much better. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 15:17, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
This new name is really awful. It tells you so little about the task, and is '''boring'''. Please revert the change, Max licenses in use is much better. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 15:17, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
:Yes, it's unexciting and it isn't as informative as it might be. But it does give one a much better idea of what the task is about than "Max licenses in use". That's why I consider it an improvement. If you can think of an further improvement, I welcome you to '''[[wp:Wikipedia:Be bold|be bold]]''' and move the page again. —[[User:Underscore|Underscore]] ([[User talk:Underscore|Talk]]) 21:01, 14 February 2010 (UTC)


I agree that a serial-numbered name is bad. However, the old name has a problem; when I first saw it I assumed it was a task about ''implementing license restrictions'', i.e. tracking the number of copies of your program running on a network. So maybe something like Text processing/Max licenses in use. —[[User:Kevin Reid|Kevin Reid]] 16:01, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
I agree that a serial-numbered name is bad. However, the old name has a problem; when I first saw it I assumed it was a task about ''implementing license restrictions'', i.e. tracking the number of copies of your program running on a network. So maybe something like Text processing/Max licenses in use. —[[User:Kevin Reid|Kevin Reid]] 16:01, 14 February 2010 (UTC)