Anonymous user
Talk:Ternary logic: Difference between revisions
→another ternary truth table==: added another section. -- ~~~~
(→Variable_truthfulness: huh?) |
(→another ternary truth table==: added another section. -- ~~~~) |
||
Line 62:
[[User:NevilleDNZ|NevilleDNZ]] 09:16, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
: Eh which C code are we talking about? This topic was about using floating point to represent probability (or so I thought), so the natural thing is using range 0 to 1. I don't see how -1 got in here? --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 11:56, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
==another ternary truth table==
I found another ternary truth table that I used for validation of some of the other functions for the REXX example (which shows more functions) at:
::: http://www.scribd.com/doc/78370674/31/A-6-2-AND-XOR-OR-XNOR-NAND
'''Ternary Computing Testbed 3-Trit Computer Architecture''' by Jeff Connelly
<br>Computer Engineering Department August 29<sup>th</sup>, 2008
<br>which is on page 59: A.6.2. AND, XOR, OR, XNOR, NAND
<br> -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 06:48, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
|