Talk:Superellipse: Difference between revisions

Line 86:
Mr Hout:   I was speaking of the browsers that are failing to render the text, whether it be from ill-formed HTML code or whatever reason, I wasn't laying blame on (or to) the browsers.   I also was using the word "invisible" (in quotes) as that was the word you introduced.   The word "invisible" suggest that the formula is there, but just can't be seen.   In fact, the formulae aren't invisible, they just aren't being rendered (in the failing case), and that is why I placed the word invisible in quotes.   There isn't any need to use such language (and interpreting my statements as being hopefully this or that ...),   this isn't helping in solving and trying to address problem resolution, and reverting to ad hominem statements and snide criticisms like the above aren't in the spirit of Rosetta Code.   Lets try to be more civil in these public forums.   -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 20:23, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
 
: A suggestion, install a second browser on your system - one of the major ones which displays the graphic file rather than a local MathML render, (possiblepossibly Chrome ? not sure which platform you are on ...) and start restoring visibility to any remaining formulae which you inadvertently rendered invisible on most browsers.
: That will also enable to you check that you are not further damaging the visibility of formulae in any other edits which you undertake, and may give you a little more insight into the expectations and outputs of the MediaWiki processor. Good luck, and happy repairs ! [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]])
9,655

edits