Anonymous user
Talk:Super-d numbers: Difference between revisions
Doubt about super-d numbers definition
m (corrected sdrawkcab) |
(Doubt about super-d numbers definition) |
||
Line 1:
== Big Doubt ==
According to the definition in https://oeis.org/A032745, I don't understand why 32767 is considered a super-5 number, since:
5*32767^5 = 188865838036335554720440
and there is no "55555" substring in it.
Same thing for super-6 number 27257.
== super-d numbers==
It is noted elsewhere that '''super-d''' numbers are always expressed in decimal (base ten). -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 07:34, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
| |||