Talk:Super-d numbers: Difference between revisions

Talk:Super-d numbers (view source)

616 bytes added , 2 years ago

Anonymous user

Revision as of 14:14, 27 March 2022 (view source) Thundergnat (talk \| contribs) (→‎Big Doubt: Sounds like a Big Integer precision problem) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 19:14, 27 March 2022 (view source) rosettacode>Dejan94 (→‎Big Doubt)
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: == Big Doubt (Solved) == According to the definition in https://oeis.org/A032745, I don't understand why 32767 is considered a super-5 number, since: 5*32767^5 = 188865838036335554720440 Line 31 ⟶ 32: : I don't have a good answer for you as I only have a passing familiarity with R. A Google search for '''R language integer precision''' turns up some possibly useful information, though again, I am not the best one to judge. --[[User:Thundergnat\|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat\|talk]]) 14:14, 27 March 2022 (UTC) :: Thanks mate, I will investigate! It's funny because R is used for complex statistical and mathematical computing and I'm really shocked about this --[[User:Dejan94\|Dejan94]] ([[User talk:Dejan94\|talk]]) 14:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC) ==== Solution ==== I did it! I installed "Rmpfr" package for arbitrary precision floating point numbers and I used it to augment precision! Now I can add the solution of the task in R. Thank you [[User:Thundergnat\|Thundergnat]] for suggestion, I also learned a new thing and a flaw of R! --[[User:Dejan94\|Dejan94]] ([[User talk:Dejan94\|talk]]) 19:14, 27 March 2022 (UTC) == super-d numbers==