Anonymous user
Talk:Sum to 100: Difference between revisions
added a new talk section.
m (added comments.) |
(added a new talk section.) |
||
Line 20:
::::: That seems overly wordy just to ask for the lowest positive sum that can't be expressed (within the rules). In particular, the requirement was expressly worded to find ''that'' sum. However, I will add an example (i.e.: such as 5074). -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 02:56, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
== extra credit ==
I had initially thought to add an extra credit solution for the ''largest'' sum (except for the obvious '''123456789'''). I'm not sure it would be a worthwhile (optional) requirement, it could be pretty CPU intensive. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 04:21, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
| |||