Talk:Sum of two adjacent numbers are primes: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
Line 18: Line 18:


: "Prime sums of two consecutive numbers" fits the task. I am not sure I have the perspective to say whether it's easier to comprehend than the current title. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 14:43, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
: "Prime sums of two consecutive numbers" fits the task. I am not sure I have the perspective to say whether it's easier to comprehend than the current title. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 14:43, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

: This is not one of the more well-thought-out tasks. It basically boils down to find ''every'' odd prime p and show it as the "sum" of floor(p/2) '+' ceil(p/2). Adjacent numbers just means n and n+1. It really is that trivial. --[[User:Petelomax|Petelomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 20:50, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:50, 18 December 2022

Task name odd and hard to understand ?

The existing task name seems logically and grammatically a bit obscure. Hard work to disentangle.

"Sum of two adjacent numbers are primes" ??

What is the subject of "are primes" ?

"Sum" ? But then why "are" and a plural ?

Or perhaps "adjacent numbers" ?

But I think nobody has (or will) find all that many "adjacent" numbers (beyond 3) that are both prime.

Does it perhaps mean "Prime sums of two consecutive numbers" ?

Might that seem a clearer title ? Or perhaps I've still misunderstood ? Hout (talk) 14:26, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

"Prime sums of two consecutive numbers" fits the task. I am not sure I have the perspective to say whether it's easier to comprehend than the current title. --Rdm (talk) 14:43, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
This is not one of the more well-thought-out tasks. It basically boils down to find every odd prime p and show it as the "sum" of floor(p/2) '+' ceil(p/2). Adjacent numbers just means n and n+1. It really is that trivial. --Petelomax (talk) 20:50, 18 December 2022 (UTC)