Talk:Sum of two adjacent numbers are primes: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
But I think nobody has (or will) find all that many "adjacent" numbers (beyond 3) that are both prime. |
But I think nobody has (or will) find all that many "adjacent" numbers (beyond 3) that are both prime. |
||
Does it perhaps mean "Prime sums of |
Does it perhaps mean "Prime sums of two consecutive numbers" ? |
||
Might that seem a clearer title ? Or perhaps I've still misunderstood ? [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 14:26, 18 December 2022 (UTC) |
Might that seem a clearer title ? Or perhaps I've still misunderstood ? [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 14:26, 18 December 2022 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 14:41, 18 December 2022
Task name odd and hard to understand ?
The existing task name seems logically and grammatically a bit obscure. Hard work to disentangle.
"Sum of two adjacent numbers are primes" ??
What is the subject of "are primes" ?
"Sum" ? But then why "are" and a plural ?
Or perhaps "adjacent numbers" ?
But I think nobody has (or will) find all that many "adjacent" numbers (beyond 3) that are both prime.
Does it perhaps mean "Prime sums of two consecutive numbers" ?
Might that seem a clearer title ? Or perhaps I've still misunderstood ? Hout (talk) 14:26, 18 December 2022 (UTC)