Anonymous user
Talk:Sum of squares: Difference between revisions
m
Two conversations at once causes typos
No edit summary |
m (Two conversations at once causes typos) |
||
Line 20:
::These nine compostional structures are primary forms in the J programming language, so from the perspective of demonstrating J code nothing less than this set seems adequate. My intuition is that this set is too large to be demonstrated conveniently as a single task, for most other languages. Perhaps function composition should be a category, instead? --[[User:TBH|TBH]] 12:27, 28 January 2008 (MST)
:::Just because it's complex in J doesn't mean it's too broad for everyone else. [[Forward difference]] seems pretty rough for Ada and Java, but it's simple in J. Maybe there's a language where function composition is significantly simpler than the nine structures in J. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 12:54, 28 January 2008 (MST)
| |||