Talk:Sum of a series: Difference between revisions

→‎significant digits: added a talk section. -- ~~~~
(→‎summing backwards: added a new comment section. -- ~~~~)
(→‎significant digits: added a talk section. -- ~~~~)
Line 19:
 
With 60, 80, or 100 digits of precision (or more), it seemed insignificant to me, almost like noise digits. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 19:39, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 
==significant digits==
 
Could it be that for '''10<sup>n</sup>''' terms,
the significant number of digits (base 10) increase at every
'''10<sup>n</sup>''' and also at every '''[π * 10<sup>n</sup>]''' as '''n→∞''' ?
 
Possibly I mean as '''n''' gets very large. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 19:59, 25 November 2012 (UTC)