Talk:Sum multiples of 3 and 5: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→What is the intent of the task?: did some task rewordsmithing) |
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) (→What is the intent of the task?: title correction?) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:...happens to have REXX and Python solutions following TimToady's Perl 6 lead. I quite liked that interpretation. If the task moves away from this, could we create a another task to preserve this interpretation? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 17:26, 14 May 2013 (UTC) |
:...happens to have REXX and Python solutions following TimToady's Perl 6 lead. I quite liked that interpretation. If the task moves away from this, could we create a another task to preserve this interpretation? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 17:26, 14 May 2013 (UTC) |
||
::I've cleaned up the task to be consistent with the (current) majority interpretation. --[[User:TimToady|TimToady]] ([[User talk:TimToady|talk]]) 17:38, 14 May 2013 (UTC) |
::I've cleaned up the task to be consistent with the (current) majority interpretation. --[[User:TimToady|TimToady]] ([[User talk:TimToady|talk]]) 17:38, 14 May 2013 (UTC) |
||
::: shouldn't the title be Multiples ?? --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 18:21, 14 May 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:21, 14 May 2013
What is the intent of the task?
- The "sum of" does not mean the same as the "count of" numbers. Which does the author intend?
- Second, the description should say "positive integers" if that is what is intended, because there are an infinite number of negative integers below 1000.
- Third, "below" doesn't include 1000, so maybe it should say "not greater than"?
Thanks. --TimToady (talk) 16:16, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- The reading of the task where:
- Sum means sum and not count.
- It is taken to mean positive integers.
- Below means up to, but not including.
- ...happens to have REXX and Python solutions following TimToady's Perl 6 lead. I quite liked that interpretation. If the task moves away from this, could we create a another task to preserve this interpretation? --Paddy3118 (talk) 17:26, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- shouldn't the title be Multiples ?? --Walterpachl (talk) 18:21, 14 May 2013 (UTC)