Anonymous user
Talk:Substring primes: Difference between revisions
m
→limit: civility ...
(→limit) |
m (→limit: civility ...) |
||
Line 44:
:::As I said above, it does not invalidate it in any way. Should a limit of 500 be used it ''will'' still find them all. But if the task says find those under 500, it implies there are more, when in fact there aren't. Still want the limit back? See my suggestion of 13:34 or perhaps if you like you can add "You may be relieved to hear that all such primes are below 500, if that helps." --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 15:58, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
:::: Pete: you posted in a recent edit summary:
''(Against my better judgement, but I've had enough of this nonsense, and''
''since some people are too weak-minded and lily-livered to do it themselves....)''
:::: Ah!! Nothing like spurious name-calling to make Rosetta Code a more friendlier place and make people feel welcome. At least, that's what I read on some Rosetta Code brochure or somewhere. But seriously, someone needs to take a chill pill. It's pretty hard to take those words back (or even to try to delete them). -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 18:54, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
| |||