Talk:Substring: Difference between revisions

m
→‎special cases: added comments about two special cases. -- ~~~~.
(→‎Substantial task changes affecting many examples: added a comment of commonness of an example (requirement). -- ~~~~)
m (→‎special cases: added comments about two special cases. -- ~~~~.)
Line 34:
 
:: (regarding showing a string minus the 1<sup>st</sup> character): &nbsp; this is covered by the 1<sup>st</sup> task requirement. &nbsp; ''Showing'' that result isn't very common, but ''using'' a string starting with the 2<sup>nd</sup> is. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 18:52, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
 
==special cases==
I am wondering how many languages allow a zero length &nbsp; '''SUBSTR''' &nbsp; (or equivalent BIF).
 
Also, the 3<sup>rd</sup> task requirement: &nbsp; if the (original) string is a null string, how many language examples would handle that case?
 
I've been bit in the hinder too many times on that little ditty. &nbsp; &nbsp; "But, but, but, it never should've happened ..."
 
-- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 19:03, 14 March 2013 (UTC)