Talk:Strange unique prime triplets: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (added another talk topic.) |
(→uniqueness of the prime numbers being added: Added uniqueness.) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Nothing was mentioned about '''n, m,''' and '''p''' being unique or not. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 11:05, 10 March 2021 (UTC) |
Nothing was mentioned about '''n, m,''' and '''p''' being unique or not. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 11:05, 10 March 2021 (UTC) |
||
:Added the uniqueness. I would like to rename it "strange unique prime triplets" or some such? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 11:33, 10 March 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== other definitions of '''strange''' primes == |
== other definitions of '''strange''' primes == |
||
Revision as of 11:33, 10 March 2021
uniqueness of the prime numbers being added
How about: 3 + 3 + 11
Nothing was mentioned about n, m, and p being unique or not. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 11:05, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Added the uniqueness. I would like to rename it "strange unique prime triplets" or some such? --Paddy3118 (talk) 11:33, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
other definitions of strange primes
Note that there are other definitions of strange primes.
One possibility is to rename this Rosetta Code task to: strange triple primes or
strange triple primes summing to a prime, or somesuch.
Mathoverflow has different definition at:
strange and non strange prime numbers are there infinitely many of them. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 11:28, 10 March 2021 (UTC)