Anonymous user
Talk:Straddling checkerboard: Difference between revisions
→Min/max: Seems unnecessary
(Is there any reason not to rename here?) |
(→Min/max: Seems unnecessary) |
||
Line 17:
I don't think min and max are in <algorithm>, at least not in Visual Studio. Is it different with GCC? [[User:MagiMaster|MagiMaster]] 11:06, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
==Rename?==
Might this page be better named as "Straddling checkerboard encryption"? (Rationale: straddling checkerboard may have other meanings and interpretations in isolation). --[[User:Markhobley|Markhobley]] 11:40, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
: We can jump that hurdle when we come to it. No sense in worrying too much about what only ''might'' happen in the future. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 14:29, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
::Ok, I had to examine the task to examine the nature of it contents. The encryption suffix would have saved a few moments. Is there any reason not to rename here? It can be done at the click of a button. --[[User:Markhobley|Markhobley]] 16:15, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
:::Shorter names are nicer/cleaner in lists and links. Proper categorization/tagging should avoid that confusion. Really, what else could it be? "Straddling checkerboard cipher" is probably a better name than the "encryption" one, but that seems to be an unnecessary specification like calling [[Linked list]] "Linked list data structure". --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 16:27, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
| |||