Revision as of 18:31, 29 December 2021 (view source) Nigel Galloway (talk \| contribs) (→‎No Search Required) ← Older edit		Revision as of 15:17, 31 December 2021 (view source) Petelomax (talk \| contribs) m (→‎No Search Required) Newer edit →
Line 84: The existence of this table and method proves that these two sequences are infinite and unique.--[[User:Nigel Galloway\|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway\|talk]]) 19:30, 26 December 2021 (UTC) :Agreed and well done''!'' IPhix ~~haven't~~entry ~~found time to check/implement any of this yet though. Being petty for a mo, I think there is a typo at the start of line 2 in the second paragraph: 2+24 -> looking up 0~~added. --[[User:Petelomax\|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax\|talk]]) 1715:0417, 2931 December 2021 (UTC) ~~::Where is that schoolboy with a pencil when I need him? It should be 2+4+265=66/10=6+24->0.--[[User:Nigel Galloway\|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway\|talk]]) 18:30, 29 December 2021 (UTC)~~

Talk:Steady squares: Difference between revisions

Talk:Steady squares (view source)