Talk:Steady squares: Difference between revisions

Line 77:
Starting with g<sub>0</sub>=5 I let g=0 and n=g<sub>0</sub>*g<sub>0</sub>/10=2.
Looking up 2 in the table g<sub>1</sub>=2. I let n=(n+g+2*g<sub>1</sub>*g<sub>0</sub>)/10=2, g=g<sub>1</sub>*g<sub>1</sub>=4.
Looking up 6 in the table g<sub>2</sub>=6. I let n=(n+g+2*g<sub>2</sub>*g<sub>0</sub>)/10=26, g=g<sub>2</sub>*g<sub>1</sub>+g<sub>1</sub>*g<sub>2</sub>=24.
Looking up 0 in the table g<sub>3</sub>=0. I let n=(n+g+2*g<sub>3</sub>*g<sub>0</sub>)/10=3, g=g<sub>3</sub>*g<sub>1</sub>+g<sub>2</sub>*g<sub>2</sub>+g<sub>1</sub>*g<sub>3</sub>=36.
Looking up 9 in the table g<sub>4</sub>=9. I let n=(n+g+2*g<sub>4</sub>*g<sub>0</sub>)/10=12, g=g<sub>4</sub>*g<sub>1</sub>+g<sub>3</sub>*g<sub>2</sub>+g<sub>2</sub>*g<sub>3</sub>+g<sub>1</sub>*g<sub>4</sub>=36.
Line 85:
 
:Agreed and well done''!'' I haven't found time to check/implement any of this yet though. Being petty for a mo, I think there is a typo at the start of line 2 in the second paragraph: 2+24 -> looking up 0. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 17:04, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
 
::Where is that schoolboy with a pencil when I need him? It should be 2+4+2*6*5=66/10=6+24->0.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 18:30, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
2,172

edits