Talk:Steady squares: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
:Note also that it must end in 1,5 or 6 (not 0 as any number ending in 0 squared ends with twice as many zeros).--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 12:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC) |
:Note also that it must end in 1,5 or 6 (not 0 as any number ending in 0 squared ends with twice as many zeros).--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 12:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC) |
||
:Ah, you beat me to it (I posted my Phix entry before reading this). I was hopeful, as you (Horst) seem to suggest, that we only have to look at the k-1 digit solutions on each iteration, and that way maybe even find ''all possible'' such numbers there could ever be, that is if any iteration found none we'd be done, but alas zero-fill totally spanners that illusion (eg 90625 off the back of 625). --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 14:53, 21 December 2021 (UTC) |