Anonymous user
Talk:State name puzzle: Difference between revisions
m
→The rules of harmonising: clearer?
m (→The rules of harmonising: clearer?) |
|||
Line 8:
? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 08:16, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
: Off the top because Wisconsin was one of the original states. Or put another way ('Wisconsin', 'New Kory') -> ('Wisconsin', 'New Kory') - the new pair doesn't count as "two other U.S. States" --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 11:36, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
:: Sorry, that should have read ('Wisconsin', 'Kory New') -> ('Wisconsin', 'New Kory'). Because in (A, B) -> ( C, D), A,B,C, and D need to be distinct otherwise it's not ''two'' other states. --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 14:19, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi Dgamey, I paired Wisconsin with:
| |||