Talk:State name puzzle: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→The rules of harmonising: equivalence.) |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
and 'York New' |
and 'York New' |
||
As they don't seem to be duplicates of each other. If the harmonisation where to equate states of two or more words if the individual words are the same, then I could then see that 'New York' is equivalent to 'York New', and 'Kory New' === 'New Kory', but I am not sure of this from the task definition. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 13:57, 29 August 2011 (UTC) |
As they don't seem to be duplicates of each other. If the harmonisation where to equate states of two or more words if the individual words are the same, then I could then see that 'New York' is equivalent to 'York New', and 'Kory New' === 'New Kory', but I am not sure of this from the task definition. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 13:57, 29 August 2011 (UTC) |
||
:I think the issue is ''The challenge was to take the names of two U.S. States, mix them all together, then rearrange the letters to form the names of two other U.S. States''. So for example, if you paired 'Wisconsin' with 'Kory New', what are the other two states? --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 14:05, 29 August 2011 (UTC) |
|||