Anonymous user
Talk:Stack traces: Difference between revisions
→Show the output!: new section
(→About Smalltalk: It's missing the output) |
(→Show the output!: new section) |
||
Line 8:
: I.e.: what was added that triggered the template "may be incorrect"? According to me it meets all the requirement... --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 20:48, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
:: There was an update to the requirements of the task (i.e., to require an actual sample stack trace so that readers can know what it looks like without running the code). I went through and tagged every answer without the output; the only one left to fix now is Smalltalk, but I can't do that for anyone as I don't have it on this system... —[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 08:02, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
== Show the output! ==
A reminder to all who participate in this task... showing the output (or a transcription of it, depending on what's convenient to actually do) is '''required'''. The purpose is precisely to allow people to compare what traces can look like so that they can understand them when they see them.
| |||