Talk:Square form factorization: Difference between revisions

m
Added anchors
mNo edit summary
m (Added anchors)
Line 49:
 
Now look under the hood; m is the multiplier,
forms P# are inon the principal and A# inon an ambiguous cycle.<br/>
Each time, after just a few steps, the multiplier or some
trivial factor is returned and the principal cycle exited:
Line 80:
A9 = ( 22, 14146,-5455)</nowiki>
 
The pattern repeatscontinues. Not showing m = 15 through 385,
the last multiplier gives:
 
Line 95:
augmenting the list with primes 13 through 37 all of the above
numbers eventually yield. But this is just a patch: there are many
more N beyond 50,000,000... At least it's clear that a larger set of
of multipliers should be used, although I would prefer a search method
where the problem doesn't exist.
 
This is what happens if the last square form is saved and we
and we[[Square_Form_Factorization#Classical heuristic|continue searching the principal cycle]]:
 
<nowiki>N = 4558849
Line 132:
 
and back on the principal cycle where a proper square is
onlybut two steps away:
 
<nowiki>P14 = (-1898, 7334, 11^2)
Line 156:
turns out to be improper &mdash; a roundabout but dependable route.
 
To complete the picture, this is the same factorization applying a queue:
[[Square_Form_Factorization#FreeBASIC|applying a queue]]:
 
<nowiki>N = 4558849
Line 170 ⟶ 171:
A6 = (-766, 6894, 2343)
f = 383 N/f = 11903</nowiki>
&mdash;[[User_talk:Udo_e._pops|Udo e.]]
 
 
Can't say I really followed that, nevermind, a translation of the 2nd C entry fixed my problems. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 19:23, 20 March 2021 (UTC)