Talk:Special pythagorean triplet: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 10:
Isn't the task to print out abc?
Also, isn't using Euclid's formula (as in the XPL0 solution) going to be faster - less values to try ? --[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 17:34, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
:Given the rules above it is necessary to check 166 numbers (even numbers between 2 and 332), the XPL0 solution is checking
The task description says there is only one triple with a + b + c = 1000, so it must be a primitive one. --[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 18:14, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
| |||