Talk:Special pythagorean triplet: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Some further observations) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Isn't the task to print out abc? |
Isn't the task to print out abc? |
||
Also, isn't using Euclid's formula (as in the XPL0 solution) going to be faster - less values to try ? --[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 17:34, 31 August 2021 (UTC) |
Also, isn't using Euclid's formula (as in the XPL0 solution) going to be faster - less values to try ? --[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 17:34, 31 August 2021 (UTC) |
||
:Given the rules above it is necessary to check 166 numbers (even numbers between 2 and 332), the XPL0 solution is checking 930.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 14:19, 1 September 2021 (UTC) |
|||
The task description says there is only one triple with a + b + c = 1000, so it must be a primitive one. --[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 18:14, 31 August 2021 (UTC) |
The task description says there is only one triple with a + b + c = 1000, so it must be a primitive one. --[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 18:14, 31 August 2021 (UTC) |
||