Talk:Sparkline in unicode: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) (→Most of these are buggy: Don' t need all these sub-headers, add attribution, and comment) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
* jq: one-wide and neglects to check bounds: ▁▃▷► |
* jq: one-wide and neglects to check bounds: ▁▃▷► |
||
* Nim: Python translation |
* Nim: Python translation |
||
* Perl: ▁▁▇█ |
* fixed! <s>Perl</s>: ▁▁▇█ |
||
* Perl 6: ▁▁▇█ |
* fixed! <s>Perl 6</s>: ▁▁▇█ |
||
* PicoLisp: ▁▂▅▅▇█ |
* PicoLisp: ▁▂▅▅▇█ |
||
* Python: ▁▁▇█ |
* Python: ▁▁▇█ |
||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
:--[[User:Oopsiedaisy|Oopsiedaisy]] ([[User talk:Oopsiedaisy|talk]]) 08:24, 24 February 2019 (UTC) |
:--[[User:Oopsiedaisy|Oopsiedaisy]] ([[User talk:Oopsiedaisy|talk]]) 08:24, 24 February 2019 (UTC) |
||
:Good point. Fixed in the Perl 6 example (and another bug I found while I was at it.) This highlights the perils of developing without a decent test |
:Good point. Fixed in the Perl 6 example (and another bug I found while I was at it.) This highlights the perils of developing without a decent test suite. On the other hand, Rosettacode makes no claims about the quality of the code on the site. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 14:42, 24 February 2019 (UTC) |
||
:It's the nature of the beast that an early bug may be faithfully translated many times. I agree that a buggy solution has value despite its flaws. I fixed the Perl example. --[[User:Oopsiedaisy|Oopsiedaisy]] ([[User talk:Oopsiedaisy|talk]]) 15:19, 24 February 2019 (UTC) |
|||
==Bar choices== |
==Bar choices== |