Talk:Sorting algorithms/Comb sort: Difference between revisions

→‎Faulty Code: task marked clarified-review ...
(→‎Faulty Code: Correct task, ENA, Wikipedia.)
(→‎Faulty Code: task marked clarified-review ...)
Line 31:
:In short - Wolf is right: the pseudo-code is wrong. (The counter-example above does not lie). --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 05:23, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
:: Correct the task and mark the examples as ENA? Someone should also make the relevant corrections at Wikipedia. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 12:48, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 
:::This task marked clarified-review; pseudo-code updated (again); WP modified; Python example modified and checked with example data above. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 19:00, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Anonymous user