Talk:Sort the letters of string in alphabetical order: Difference between revisions

Line 45:
 
::::::: I think you meant to say ''utterly failed to demonstrate''. I see no function there, then or now. Otherwise I assume you are agreeing with me, or is there an interpretation of "Write the function" that specifically means "not a one-liner" that I don't know about, or for that matter is there an interpretation of "Write the function" that specifically means "or not, top level code will do just fine too"? --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]])
 
:::::::: What I meant is that he's coded the sort routine rather than using Ring's built-in Sort() function, though admittedly he hasn't put his own code in a function. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 18:46, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 
:::: The task title and description are currently at odds with each other. The former says sort in alphabetical order and the latter in lexicographical order. Given that we have example strings containing both upper and lower case letters and non-letters, lexicographical order seems the most appropriate to me and I therefore agree with Paddy3118's suggested title change above. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 15:48, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
9,476

edits