Talk:Solve a Hidato puzzle: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(more and better supporting documentation needed for this task.) |
m (→Needed improvements: oh that's what they meant!) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
: It seems like an interesting problem but there really needs to be more supporting information for this task. |
: It seems like an interesting problem but there really needs to be more supporting information for this task. |
||
:* The linked WP article [[wp:Hidato]] is of poor quality and provides very little of use, there isn't even a through discussion of rules there saying how to get to the solution. The solution doesn't seem to be full of consecutive numbers in every row, column, or diagonal; and it certainly isn't clear how the numbers got laid down. Some lines are consecutive except for one number. Others aren't consecutive at all. There may be a method but it's far from obvious. |
:* The linked WP article [[wp:Hidato]] is of poor quality and provides very little of use, there isn't even a through discussion of rules there saying how to get to the solution. The solution doesn't seem to be full of consecutive numbers in every row, column, or diagonal; and it certainly isn't clear how the numbers got laid down. Some lines are consecutive except for one number. Others aren't consecutive at all. There may be a method but it's far from obvious. |
||
::* Oh! The numbers wind through the grid from lowest to highest. Now why didn't it say that clearly instead of just leaving it at 'consecutive numbers'? --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 20:10, 12 January 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:* What's with the Knights Tour extra credit reference (we already have a task)? Maybe it's an easy step up but I don't see it and the task already seems complex enough. It's a nice fact that this can used for this, but why make it even optionally part of the task? |
:* What's with the Knights Tour extra credit reference (we already have a task)? Maybe it's an easy step up but I don't see it and the task already seems complex enough. It's a nice fact that this can used for this, but why make it even optionally part of the task? |
||
:* I think this is a solution task. Generating a board should be another task. |
:* I think this is a solution task. Generating a board should be another task. |