Talk:Smith numbers: Difference between revisions
(→task output requirements: added a new talk section.) |
m (→task wording: added highlighting to a query.) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
==task wording== |
==task wording== |
||
In the phrase in the task's definition preamble: |
In the phrase in the task's definition preamble: |
||
<br> |
<br><big> |
||
:::: ''the sum of digits of its prime factors excluding 1'' |
:::: ''the sum of digits of its prime factors excluding 1'' |
||
</big> |
|||
<br>isn't the text ''excluding 1'' redundant as unity will never be a prime factor (by definition). -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 03:26, 25 April 2016 (UTC) |
<br>isn't the text <big> ''excluding 1'' </big> redundant as unity will never be a prime factor (by definition). -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 03:26, 25 April 2016 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 03:28, 25 April 2016
task output
Instead of finding (and I presume, display) all the Smith numbers below 10,000,
to reduce the amount of data display, how about just displaying all the Smith
numbers below 1,000, and then also just show the count of Smith numbers
below 10,000? -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 03:19, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Then, for optional credit, show the count of Smith numbers below 100,000 and
also 1 million. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 03:19, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
task output requirements
It wasn't specifically asked for (in the task's requirements), but it's usually a
a good thing for the programming entries to show their output (if feasible),
and also make the Rosetta Code task's output requirements unambiguously known. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 03:19, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
However, showing all Smith numbers below 10k is pushing it, especially if all
the programming entries choose to show their output. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 03:19, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
task wording
In the phrase in the task's definition preamble:
- the sum of digits of its prime factors excluding 1
isn't the text excluding 1 redundant as unity will never be a prime factor (by definition). -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 03:26, 25 April 2016 (UTC)