Anonymous user
Talk:Shell one-liner: Difference between revisions
→Incorrect solutions: Fuzzy.
(→Incorrect solutions: different meaning of utility) |
(→Incorrect solutions: Fuzzy.) |
||
Line 49:
:::: That does not depend much on what string eval capability is present in the language, but rather what other stuff is present on the system. Suppose you pull the full source code of Linux kernel and type <code>make && make modules && make install</code>, then proceed to claim that the most significant part of the kernel is make's one-liner power -- no you wouldn't. Would you? --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 04:17, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
:::::I was thinking of a hypothetical compiled language that came with a web server as part of its standard libraries (Boo perhaps)? Sitting around waiting for Linux to compile from source would be of little practical use. cat'ing a small program to compile and link to a pre-compiled web server library ''might''. but as I was alluding to earlier - its in a grey and fuzzy area. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 04:41, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
==Whilst/while==
| |||