Talk:Sexy primes: Difference between revisions
→possible errors in most programs
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) (Reassemble my comments and add some responses) |
|||
Line 39:
::::: '''"So I rather resent the fact that I found (as it turned out) an incorrect output, and you thought that I meant another incorrect output"''' Make me play guessing games and then get all bent when I guess? Ok. Resent away. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 11:46, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
:Why not simply define:<br>SP pairs as n such that n<1000035 and n is prime and n-6 is prime<br>SP triplets as n is a member of the set of SP pairs and n-12 is prime<br>SP quadruplets as n is a member of the set of SP triplets and n-18 is prime<br>SP quintuplets as n is a member of the set of SP quadruplets and n-24 is prime<br>Unsexy primes as n<1000035 and n-6 is not prime and n+6 is not prime<br>--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 12:54, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
| |||