Anonymous user
Talk:Sexy primes: Difference between revisions
→possible errors in most programs: suggestion
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) (Fair point, but I would go about demonstrating it differently) |
(→possible errors in most programs: suggestion) |
||
Line 13:
:Hmm. Fair point, in part at least. As I see it, if the limit is 100, 97 should not be listed as a pair, even though it would be with a higher limit. It '''should''' be caught as a sexy prime though, and so '''should not''' be listed in the unsexy primes. I am somewhat disinclined to make testing at a limit of 100 an ''additional'' requirement. I would rather make the limit 1_000_035 which splits the pair 1000033,100039 and ensure that 1000033 is not listed as unsexy nor as a pair (it's sexy, but not a pair within the limit). --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 15:38, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
:Maybe say start|end of prime group is <= limit? It is pretty easy to cover either case. [[User:Craigd|CraigD]] ([[User talk:Craigd|talk]])
| |||