Anonymous user
Talk:Set consolidation: Difference between revisions
→Sets of Sets: There can be one.
(→Sets of Sets: new section) |
(→Sets of Sets: There can be one.) |
||
Line 28:
This task specifies an intermediate result which can be a set or which can be a set of sets. But this can become ambiguous if the input is a set of sets of sets. I think it would be better if the task stuck with one level of abstraction for intermediate results (if arguments and all intermediate results were a set of sets). --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 22:35, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
:Hi Rdm, think of the intermediate as being consistently a set of set'''s''' where the number of set'''s''' can equal one; or more. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 07:17, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
| |||