Anonymous user
Talk:Sequence of non-squares: Difference between revisions
→bc problem: fixed by why needing fixing?!
(→bc problem: fixed by why needing fixing?!) |
|||
Line 50:
: Ah sorry, understood the sense now! Instead of reading the task, I've looked at sources, and get wrong understanding of the task, sorry! Going to fix it! --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 13:10, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
: Back on my steps: the assertion exists to check the validity of the formula upto 10^6, or to check the validity of the implementations (because of precision) upto 10^6? I think the formula has no such limit; so the check is there because of limits that bc, by design, has not... so to bc makes not too much sense the "assertion" part. Anyway, it is there now, if I've got it right this time! --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 13:27, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
| |||