Anonymous user
Talk:Sequence: smallest number greater than previous term with exactly n divisors: Difference between revisions
Talk:Sequence: smallest number greater than previous term with exactly n divisors (view source)
Revision as of 18:15, 10 April 2019
, 5 years agono edit summary
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 9:
[https://www.nayuki.io/page/calculate-divisors-javascript] 4477456 = 2^4 × 23^4 got 25 divisors like 6765201 =3^4*17^4
== Which integer sequence is meant output for F# ==
I don't understand the output of the '''F#''' entry. Where is the list of the first '''15''' numbers of the ''anti-prime plus'' sequence? -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:59, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Line 26:
::::::: Really? Why would someone who understands number theory not be better?--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 16:20, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
:::::::: Perhaps we should have two tasks: A005179 Smallest number with exactly n divisors; and A069654 a(1) = 1; for n > 1, a(n) = smallest number > a(n-1) having exactly n divisors. <br> If we can only have one I would favour A005179 for its number theoretic interest. Why does the sequence have spikes at prime n? Anyone proposing this task should be able to answer this question!!!! --[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 16:20, 10 April 2019 (UTC)▼
::::::::: Already said in [[Anti-primes_Plus#Pascal|Pascal]]. waitung for CalmoSoft :-) -- [[User:Horsth|Horsth]]
▲Perhaps we should have two tasks: A005179 Smallest number with exactly n divisors; and A069654 a(1) = 1; for n > 1, a(n) = smallest number > a(n-1) having exactly n divisors. <br> If we can only have one I would favour A005179 for its number theoretic interest. Why does the sequence have spikes at prime n? Anyone proposing this task should be able to answer this question!!!! --[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 16:20, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
| |||