Talk:Sequence: nth number with exactly n divisors: Difference between revisions

Talk:Sequence: nth number with exactly n divisors (view source)

394 bytes added , 3 years ago

2,468

edits

Revision as of 10:00, 12 April 2019 (view source) Thundergnat (talk \| contribs) m (true, but not the point I was making.) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 13:56, 8 March 2021 (view source) CalmoSoft (talk \| contribs) (→‎Handy hints)
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 18: : That is one <strike>hel</strike> heck of some dandy hints!!     -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger\|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger\|talk]]) 18:56, 11 April 2019 (UTC) May this is a naive question: Why 2nd term of sequence is not 2 but 3. <br>2 has exactly 2 divisors: 1 and 2 (CalmoSoft) : 2 is the '''first''' number with exactly 2 divisors but 3 is the '''second''' such number. So, 3 is the second term of the sequence. --[[User:PureFox\|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox\|talk]]) 13:48, 8 March 2021 (UTC) <br> : Thanks PureFox, now I understand it (CalmoSoft)