Talk:Same fringe: Difference between revisions

Line 66:
 
I was just wondering about the 10, 20, 30 and 1, 2, 3? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 19:49, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
:Judging from the previous Haskell code (which I have replaced), I believe the author intends n()the withfirst 3argument thingsof n to meanbe athe nodevalue withof athat valuenode, and twothe following to be children. And if there are no brancheschildren, andthen it is a leaf. And that the value of thea node that is not a leaf is not considered when taking the fringe. Or something like that. They may be confused because there are different concepts of trees, some with values at nodes and some without; and the problem is not very specific about that. --[[User:Spoon!|Spoon!]] 01:28, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Anonymous user