Talk:SHA-256: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Created page with "== Perl6 implementation takes all input in memory == The current implementation takes all data at once, which is not a good idea if the data is large. Ideally the function sh...")
 
(→‎Spec: new section)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Perl6 implementation takes all input in memory ==
== [[Perl 6]] implementation takes all input in memory ==
The current implementation takes all data at once, which is not a good idea if the data is large.
The current implementation takes all data at once, which is not a good idea if the data is large.

Ideally the function should be able to take a possibly lazy list of buffers.
Ideally the function should be able to take a possibly lazy list of buffers.

All suggestions welcome.
All suggestions welcome.
--[[User:Grondilu|Grondilu]] ([[User talk:Grondilu|talk]]) 20:46, 23 April 2013 (UTC)


== Spec ==
--[[User:Grondilu|Grondilu]] ([[User talk:Grondilu|talk]]) 20:46, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

This SHA-256 task really needs the spec included, the way the SHA-1 included the necessary reference material for that task. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 23:10, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:10, 14 November 2015

Perl 6 implementation takes all input in memory

The current implementation takes all data at once, which is not a good idea if the data is large. Ideally the function should be able to take a possibly lazy list of buffers. All suggestions welcome. --Grondilu (talk) 20:46, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Spec

This SHA-256 task really needs the spec included, the way the SHA-1 included the necessary reference material for that task. --Rdm (talk) 23:10, 14 November 2015 (UTC)