Anonymous user
Talk:Runtime evaluation/In an environment: Difference between revisions
Talk:Runtime evaluation/In an environment (view source)
Revision as of 10:26, 30 April 2009
, 15 years ago→Why marked as incorrect?: tcl?
(oops, didn't note changes made) |
(→Why marked as incorrect?: tcl?) |
||
Line 14:
Oh, I just saw your changes. The Octave example is now correct (and I like the variety of using a list/vector), but the Tcl example was better in the previous version -- the problem with it then was that the proc eval_twice should specifically bind the variable name x, not call a function with an arbitrary local variable name. --[[User:Kevin Reid|Kevin Reid]] 02:21, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
: Sorry but I can't understand why (maybe my Tcl is not so strong). Isn't it the same of PHP, Perl, Python, Ruby....? (I.e.: using a function). The only difference, is that it explicitly says which is the "dummy" var (the lambda var or how we want to call it). Maybe the example is more similar to the second Lisp example, since that is the way in Tcl to express a lambda expression (as far as I know/understand; going to find more about right now). --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 10:26, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
| |||