Talk:Run-length encoding: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(New page: "The output can be anything." might be too open-ended. I would prefer it if all the solutions did it the same way, or something. --~~~~)
 
(task is too limited (can't encode digits))
Line 1: Line 1:
"The output can be anything." might be too open-ended. I would prefer it if all the solutions did it the same way, or something. --[[Special:Contributions/76.167.241.45|76.167.241.45]] 18:32, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
"The output can be anything." might be too open-ended. I would prefer it if all the solutions did it the same way, or something. --[[Special:Contributions/76.167.241.45|76.167.241.45]] 18:32, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

I would prefer this task to use a run length encoding which will work at least on all ASCII characters. The current encoding can't represent [0-9]. --[[User:IanOsgood|IanOsgood]] 19:27, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:27, 24 April 2009

"The output can be anything." might be too open-ended. I would prefer it if all the solutions did it the same way, or something. --76.167.241.45 18:32, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

I would prefer this task to use a run length encoding which will work at least on all ASCII characters. The current encoding can't represent [0-9]. --IanOsgood 19:27, 24 April 2009 (UTC)