Talk:Rosetta Code/Rank languages by popularity: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
m (→‎wanted: a complete list: updated the number of languages. -- ~~~~)
m (→‎wanted: a complete list: changed a comment (with strikeout).)
Line 251: Line 251:
If somebody else creates a more complete ranking, better filtering program, or an automated version (or more timely), I'll reduce the number of Rosetta Code languages ranked in the REXX '''output''' section. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 00:11, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
If somebody else creates a more complete ranking, better filtering program, or an automated version (or more timely), I'll reduce the number of Rosetta Code languages ranked in the REXX '''output''' section. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 00:11, 23 July 2012 (UTC)


Currently, the REXX example reports on all '''471''' programming languages, but there is code to support the skipping of languages that have less than a certain (specified) number of examples.
Currently, the REXX example reports on all &nbsp; <strike> '''471''' </strike> &nbsp; (see below) &nbsp; programming languages, but there is code to support the skipping of languages that have less than a certain (specified) number of examples.


However, listing them all enabled me to find some languages that are "misspelled" as far as case goes (inconsistent upper/lower/mixed spellings, use of different glyphs, etc.). -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 04:51, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
However, listing them all enabled me to find some languages that are "misspelled" as far as case goes (inconsistent upper/lower/mixed spellings, use of different glyphs, etc.). -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 04:51, 5 September 2012 (UTC)