Talk:Rosetta Code/Rank languages by popularity: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (→wanted: a complete list: updated the number of languages. -- ~~~~) |
m (→wanted: a complete list: changed "nobody" to "nothing". -- ~~~~) |
||
Line 236: | Line 236: | ||
<br>Now, there're '''500''' programming languages. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 07:01, 2 November 2013 (UTC) |
<br>Now, there're '''500''' programming languages. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 07:01, 2 November 2013 (UTC) |
||
<br>Now, there're '''501''' programming languages. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 09:40, 18 November 2013 (UTC) |
<br>Now, there're '''501''' programming languages. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 09:40, 18 November 2013 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | |||
<br>Now, there're '''502''' programming languages. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:05, 16 December 2013 (UTC) |
<br>Now, there're '''502''' programming languages. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:05, 16 December 2013 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | |||
<br>Now, there're '''503''' programming languages. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 11:10, 20 December 2013 (UTC) |
|||
<br><br>The decrease in the number of programming languages is due to combining the |
<br><br>The decrease in the number of programming languages is due to combining the |
||
:::* '''UC++''' |
:::* '''UC++''' |
||
Line 262: | Line 263: | ||
:::* 2 (tied) gnu |
:::* 2 (tied) gnu |
||
:::* 6 ape |
:::* 6 ape |
||
with all 2<sup>nd</sup> place names marked as ''tied'' for 2<sup>nd</sup>, and |
with all 2<sup>nd</sup> place names marked as ''tied'' for 2<sup>nd</sup>, and nothing marked as 3<sup>rd</sup>, 4<sup>th</sup> or 5<sup>th</sup>. |
||
<br>These duplicates (tied for placement) would make a good addition to this task (to rank languages ''correctly'') -- or lacking that, a good Rosetta Code task that can stand by itself. |
<br>These duplicates (tied for placement) would make a good addition to this task (to rank languages ''correctly'') -- or lacking that, a good Rosetta Code task that can stand by itself. |
||
<br>Note that the chicken was disqualified as it wouldn't cross the road. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 20:48, 7 January 2013 (UTC) |
<br>Note that the chicken was disqualified as it wouldn't cross the road. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 20:48, 7 January 2013 (UTC) |