Talk:Rosetta Code/List authors of task descriptions/Full list: Difference between revisions

Basically, it ain't gonna happen...
(added some comments.)
(Basically, it ain't gonna happen...)
 
Line 49:
 
:::::::: As far as misrepresented task entries (for counting), there are several, and I do not know where they all are.   Such entries are where all the   '''BASIC'''s   were lumped into one section,   and each flavor of   BASIC   was then entered under a sub-section   (most often on a different page),   and those sub-sections of BASIC aren't counted   (as per all the types/flavors of BASIC).   One such Rosetta Code task is   '''99 Bottles of Beer''', (the BASIC section)   where they were all clumped together under BASIC.   This, if I remember, was part of a campaign to reduce the size of some (large) Rosetta Code pages by grouping the   BASICs   into one (sub-section),   and then have a   BASIC   page for that Rosetta Code task.   I have no idea how deep that project went.   One by-product of that is,   some Rosetta Code tasks have   (for instance)   '''Wee Basic'''   under   BASIC,   others have it at the end of the programming language list, under the   '''W'''s,   making it a tad harder to locate a particular BASIC when browsing Rosetta Code tasks solutions.   But the bottom line is that most flavors of '''BASIC''' are under-counted.   And some   BASICs   like '''Locomotive Basic'''   (note the difference in the capitalization of BASIC in these last two examples),   according to some,   shouldn't even belong under the BASIC umbrella).     -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 00:01, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
 
::::::::: <quote>If you notice one, either fix it or point it out to me.</quote> Ok, let me put some caveats on there. The whole Basic debacle is a can of worms I'm not willing to open right now. IMO it would have been better off to just give every dialect its own task header and not try to "group" Basic dialects together, but that was decision made and partially implemented by others and would be nightmarish to try to untangle at this point. Especially trying to do it manually through the web interface. So yeah, you're sure right about that, but I'm not taking it on right now. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 01:18, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
10,333

edits