Talk:Rosetta Code/Fix code tags: Difference between revisions

I replaced GeshiCodeTag's behavior with respect to unsupported languages so that it just falls back uses an HTML <code> block. These will be distinguishable from GeSHi-targeted <code> blocks because they won't have a language parameter associated with them. Be mindful of that. --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 08:01, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

 

At script end "c0de" will be replaced to "code" again.

Now the script can be 100% automatated, using Wikimedia API. (I think.)</nowiki> --[[User:Guga360|Guga360]] 16:28, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

 

== Please no "code" to "tt" change! ==

I dislike the new change of "fixing" <nowiki><code>...</code> to <tt>...</tt></nowiki>. The disabling of code tags is temporary, and using code tags (logigal markup) instead of tt tags (physical markup) is the Right Thing. I ''intentionally'' did not change code tags meant as inline code tags when changing code->lang (I did change inline code tags back when it seemed that the new meaning of code would prevail). --

 

: Sorry it was me; I realized your point and stopped me by myself before reading this, nonetheless I've already done little damages and will go fixing them as soon as I can. --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 15:46, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

 

== Self-modifying code==

:It's possible to protect this article from begin edited by bots? --[[User:Guga360]]

::Kinda sorta, yeah. I can currently offer varying levels of protection. Allow all normal access, disallow anonymous or disallow anyone but sysops. So I'd have to make it a sysops-only page, which stymies the page. It'd be better if your bot could be modified to attempt to detect code snippet boundaries and not modify content within them. --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 23:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

 

== ambiguity ==

 

This task is inadequately defined, since any tag would match <%s>.

 

== REXX ==

 

should old.j be old.k ???