Talk:Rosetta Code/Count examples/Full list/Tier 4: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
m (and by the way,)
No edit summary
Line 4:
 
: Is it ideal? No, it's not. But the algorithm is pretty darn accurate as long as the task header markup is correct. Am I particularly inclined to modify the parsing logic to find unsupported markup? No, not really. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 15:55, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 
:: So it is rosettacode that is supporting unsupported markup when it generates http://www.rosettacode.org/wiki/Category:F_Sharp. Where is supported markup defined? --[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 16:08, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 
:(And by the way, that 123 is the number of languages that it recognizes as having an entry for that task, not not an entry number.) --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 16:02, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
2,172

edits