Talk:Reverse polish notation: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Only one language is missing on the other page)
(→‎Dup?: Ready for redirect)
 
Line 10: Line 10:
:*Tcl: A working solution exists already on the other page.
:*Tcl: A working solution exists already on the other page.
:Thus I suggest to redirect this page to the other one as soon as a working Erlang solution is available. --[[User:AndiPersti|Andreas Perstinger]] ([[User talk:AndiPersti|talk]]) 21:29, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
:Thus I suggest to redirect this page to the other one as soon as a working Erlang solution is available. --[[User:AndiPersti|Andreas Perstinger]] ([[User talk:AndiPersti|talk]]) 21:29, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
::Since we now have an Erlang solution on [[Parsing/RPN_calculator_algorithm]], redirecting to it should be fine, isn't it? --[[User:AndiPersti|Andreas Perstinger]] ([[User talk:AndiPersti|talk]]) 08:37, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 08:37, 24 March 2014

Dup?

This seems like a duplicate of http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Parsing/RPN_calculator_algorithm to me. --TimToady (talk) 20:43, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, couldn't find that page. I do think it is a duplicate. Elyashiv (talk) 17:50, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
I've marked the page as duplicate. The current 5 examples should be easy to merge with the ones on Parsing/RPN_calculator_algorithm.
  • Common Lisp: I've already adapted the code and added it to the other page.
  • D: The version on this page is just a reduced version of the code on the other page.
  • Erlang: Needs to be adapted for the parsing specs. I will ask Rabuf if s/he can do it.
  • Python: Has at least one TypeError and uses IMHO bad style. There is already a working solution on the other page so no big loss.
  • Tcl: A working solution exists already on the other page.
Thus I suggest to redirect this page to the other one as soon as a working Erlang solution is available. --Andreas Perstinger (talk) 21:29, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Since we now have an Erlang solution on Parsing/RPN_calculator_algorithm, redirecting to it should be fine, isn't it? --Andreas Perstinger (talk) 08:37, 24 March 2014 (UTC)