Talk:Respond to an unknown method call: Difference between revisions

ok
(ok)
Line 39:
::::the important part is that the name <code>message1></code> is received by <code>(no-applicable-method>)</code> so that it can react differently to different messages.
:::: the difference is that <code>(no-applicable-method>)</code> and <code>(send*)</code> can be part of your library, while a user of the library only needs to do <code>(send* 'message1> Obj)</code>. this would be even more flexible than the common lisp solution where at least a generic function needs to exist before <code>(no-applicable-method)</code> can be called. but the generic function doesn't do much more than what <code>(send*)</code> would do in this example.--[[User:EMBee|eMBee]] 13:15, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
::::: Hmm, OK, though I'm not convinced. The task description doesn't say it this way. So I'll redefine 'send'. --[[User:Abu|Abu]] 14:01, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Anonymous user