Anonymous user
Talk:Rep-string: Difference between revisions
→Reason for update request: Didn't mean to imply...
m (→Clarification: added rebuttal. -- ~~~~) |
(→Reason for update request: Didn't mean to imply...) |
||
Line 31:
:: Why should these be nom-reps?? --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 16:40, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
::: Obviously just a braino; even the Python examples agree they are indeed reps. --[[User:TimToady|TimToady]] ([[User talk:TimToady|talk]]) 17:41, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
::Hi Walter. I meant that Ledrugs' original code gave the wrong answer for these, not that they weren't rep-strings. Sorry for the confusion. Ledrugs' method was a great new way of solving things and I had to unlearn how I was doing things to figure out what he was doing. I thought that the corner cases of '11' and '00' needed mental investigation and that made me look at the limit of a range and think it - the original code, would need tweaking. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 19:15, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
| |||