Talk:Recursive descent parser generator: Difference between revisions

A comment about input specification
No edit summary
(A comment about input specification)
Line 36:
:The above can work ''against'' making a good RC task sometimes. You really don't want to make things too long. You also want to make a task in which the examples generated are comparable. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 07:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
::I think if it can handle the above example, it'd be enough. [[User:MagiMaster|MagiMaster]] ([[User talk:MagiMaster|talk]]) 16:49, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
::: For what it's worth: the implementation I provided handles the example, but uses the same precedence for multiplication and addition. I would not have had to do it that way, but was hoping for more examples before I went there. (The trick is that the parser resolves from right to left, so it's result happens to coincide with the result you would get from a left to right parser with multiplication having a tighter precedence than addition or subtraction.) --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 18:38, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
6,951

edits