Talk:Range extraction: Difference between revisions

m
fixed typo.
m (fixed typo.)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1:
== Might I suggest ...==
Might I suggest breaking the format description out to a separate page and transcluding it both here and in [[Range expansion]]? --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 00:17, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 
Line 57 ⟶ 58:
==Comment in Ada solution on notation==
:''"For real-life applications it is better to use the notation -9..-4"''
True. if I were doing this for real then I would have liked to use a different range indication character, but, as in so many things, I modified/simplified an [http://www.cislccs.ucarmiami.edu/docshpc/LSFlsf/7.0.36/admin/jobarrays.html#wp1004400 existing format that used dashes], to allow negative numbers - hence the compromise. (On seeing how easy it was to parse I left it in).
 
==TUSCRIPT example==